LingoAI describes user choice and scoped permissions as design goals for Holon.
You do. Not LingoAI, not the AI provider, and not the platform.
That's the principle behind Holon Agent 3.0: One Ontology, Multiple Agents.
You should be free to choose, switch, combine, or dismiss AI agents—while controlling what each can access and do on your behalf.
We're building the architecture to make that freedom practical and enforceable.
Your data. Your agents. Your decisions. Your sovereignty.
Preserves the author’s answer and its actual parent question.
The summary and connections are editorial. Claims remain attributed to their source; this page does not independently verify them.
No further quoted or reposted post found in the checked source
Connected source discussionWho chooses the AI agents that act for you?@Capy_Research ↗
Responding to Geoffrey Hinton’s book announcement, LingoAI describes personal ontology, user-selected agents and a human counterpart to AI alignment.
LingoAI argues for local-first personal AI, user-controlled interruption and decentralized accountability, prompted by a geopolitical source post. The cited warnings and claims are attributed to their authors.
VIDEOLingoAI reposts Henry Wang’s response to Matthew Kilkenny: enforceable permissions, spending limits, portability and recovery as practical tests of AI sovereignty.
Responding to a developer’s account-ban report, LingoAI discusses local hardware, cloud Holons and economic autonomy. The platform-policy and account-ban allegations have not been independently verified here.